Remove Ethics Remove Evaluation Remove Peer Review
article thumbnail

Easy to find, not always true: Helping students evaluate AI-generated content

eSchool News

Teaching the new core four To help students become critical consumers of information, educators must still emphasize four essential evaluative criteria, but these must now be framed in the context of AI-generated content and advanced search systems. The stakes are higher. The tools are smarter. The educators role is more important than ever.

article thumbnail

2024: The year of generative AI

eSchool News

The traditional methods of testing and evaluation must evolve to accommodate the capabilities of AI. Project-based assessments, peer reviews, and interactive simulations offer students opportunities to demonstrate their understanding in diverse and meaningful ways. Gen AI is flipping this on its head.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

How to combat misuse of AI in student writing

eSchool News

Those reasons may include: lack of writing skills, insecurity around writing skills, struggles with time management, confusion about the topic, missing grammar and organizational skills, having no motivation or interest, missing real-world relevance, poor work ethic, lack of access to resources, and home/personal life stress. MagicSchool.AI

Writing 326
article thumbnail

AI Ethics: A Cautionary Tale

Gaggle Speaks

It was unintentional—nevertheless, the results were substantiated, peer-reviewed, and published in Science , a historically trusted and credible journal of scientific discovery.

Ethics 52
article thumbnail

Artificial Intelligence: The Rise of ChatGPT and Its Implications

Faculty Focus

The paper passed three peer reviewers who reported that they believed the paper was written by a person. 1) noted that ChatGPT wrote academic abstracts that passed through the peer review process 32% of the time even after reviewers had been told that some of the abstracts were fake. A report by Paul (2023, p.1)

article thumbnail

Artificial Intelligence: The Rise of ChatGPT and Its Implications

Faculty Focus

The paper passed three peer reviewers who reported that they believed the paper was written by a person. 1) noted that ChatGPT wrote academic abstracts that passed through the peer review process 32% of the time even after reviewers had been told that some of the abstracts were fake. A report by Paul (2023, p.1)

article thumbnail

Using Case Studies to Develop Questioning Skills

Faculty Focus

Three ideas—evaluation, categorization, and ideation—for utilizing case studies to develop student questioning skills follow. Evaluation Faculty can have students critique the discussion questions associated with the case. What ethical issues does this situation present? What are alternative solutions?

Questions 105