Knowledge Peer Review Plagiarism 
eSchool News
JUNE 28, 2024
Examples include small-group brainstorming and “Mini Socratics” (small-group Socratic Seminars), gamification methods giving students points for each component they’ve completed in an assignment, small-group peer reviews where students reflect on each other’s ideas instead of correcting errors, and more.
Faculty Focus
JANUARY 21, 2025
Teaching example: In one of my recent courses, I included a “workshop day” for students to peer review each other’s drafts of case conceptualizations. Retrieval practice and Blooms taxonomy: Do students need fact knowledge before higher-order learning? Rethinking Plagiarism in the Era of Generative AI.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Edsurge
SEPTEMBER 26, 2017
According to Blake, the process behind the scoring “is one of anonymous peer and expert review” based on “adaptive comparative judgement.” Blake says people will be peer reviewed several times and will be reviewed by a panel of multiple experts. And yet, historically you haven’t been able to tell me what you know.”
Edsurge
NOVEMBER 6, 2017
Most digital writing tools offer limited assistance: they check for plagiarism, allow a student to track changes, or offer the ability to add comments. Assessing one’s own writing and providing feedback to peers both help to move students forward as writers. Students, in most classroom contexts, are not accustomed to being evaluators.
Faculty Focus
JANUARY 21, 2025
Teaching example: In one of my recent courses, I included a “workshop day” for students to peer review each other’s drafts of case conceptualizations. Retrieval practice and Blooms taxonomy: Do students need fact knowledge before higher-order learning? Rethinking Plagiarism in the Era of Generative AI.
Ask a Tech Teacher
AUGUST 9, 2017
It uses an experiential, self-paced environment to walk teachers through all the steps needed to create and use the Moodle platform and then provides nine hands-on “challenges” that users complete to assess their Moodle knowledge in a real-world (albeit sandbox) Moodle environment. Podcasts of lessons, how-tos, reviews, and more.
Faculty Focus
AUGUST 24, 2023
The paper passed three peer reviewers who reported that they believed the paper was written by a person. 1) noted that ChatGPT wrote academic abstracts that passed through the peer review process 32% of the time even after reviewers had been told that some of the abstracts were fake. A report by Paul (2023, p.1)
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
327 
Let's personalize your content