Remove Exams Remove Learning Technologies Remove Plagiarism
article thumbnail

Pushback Is Growing Against Automated Proctoring Services. But So Is Their Use

Edsurge

Instead of reserving them for high-stakes assessments like final exams, some professors now use these tools for routine work like weekly quizzes. million exams. We have 2 to 4 million weekly students who are using the product,” he adds, noting that the company was used in 6 million exams in all of 2019. In October we did 3.5

article thumbnail

Essential Considerations for Addressing the Possibility of AI-Driven Cheating, Part 1

Faculty Focus

Should you change the way you give exams and design assignments? Banning the use of technology for exams can create an inaccessible, discriminatory learning experience. Banning the use of technology for exams can create an inaccessible, discriminatory learning experience.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

Essential Considerations for Addressing the Possibility of AI-Driven Cheating, Part 1

Faculty Focus

Should you change the way you give exams and design assignments? Banning the use of technology for exams can create an inaccessible, discriminatory learning experience. Banning the use of technology for exams can create an inaccessible, discriminatory learning experience.

article thumbnail

Five Tips for Writing Academic Integrity Statements in the Age of AI 

Faculty Focus

As educators and students grapple with what is allowed when using generative AI (GenAI) tools, I have compiled five tips to help you design or redesign academic integrity statements for your syllabus, assignments, exams, and course activities. Banning GenAI tools is not the solution Many students use GenAI tools to aid their learning.

article thumbnail

Essential Considerations for Addressing the Possibility of AI-Driven Cheating, Part 2

Faculty Focus

While this might not be feasible in a large class, there are other ways you can incorporate trial and error in large classes, like having low-stakes quizzes that can be taken multiple times to demonstrate mastery of learning rather than high-stakes one-short midterms and final exams. link] Nolan, B. Business Insider. link] Piercey, J.

Failure 98
article thumbnail

Essential Considerations for Addressing the Possibility of AI-Driven Cheating, Part 2

Faculty Focus

While this might not be feasible in a large class, there are other ways you can incorporate trial and error in large classes, like having low-stakes quizzes that can be taken multiple times to demonstrate mastery of learning rather than high-stakes one-short midterms and final exams. link] Nolan, B. Business Insider. link] Piercey, J.

Failure 98
article thumbnail

Five Tips for Writing Academic Integrity Statements in the Age of AI 

Faculty Focus

As educators and students grapple with what is allowed when using generative AI (GenAI) tools, I have compiled five tips to help you design or redesign academic integrity statements for your syllabus, assignments, exams, and course activities. Banning GenAI tools is not the solution Many students use GenAI tools to aid their learning.