Ethics Peer Review Plagiarism 
eSchool News
MAY 9, 2025
A deep search tool might include academic preprints from 2024, but not peer-reviewed journal articles published yesterday. Ethical AI use and academic integrity Generative AI tools introduce powerful possibilities including significant reductions, as well as a new frontier of plagiarism and uncritical thinking.
eSchool News
JUNE 28, 2024
Those reasons may include: lack of writing skills, insecurity around writing skills, struggles with time management, confusion about the topic, missing grammar and organizational skills, having no motivation or interest, missing real-world relevance, poor work ethic, lack of access to resources, and home/personal life stress.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Faculty Focus
JANUARY 21, 2025
Teaching example: In one of my recent courses, I included a “workshop day” for students to peer review each other’s drafts of case conceptualizations. Rethinking Plagiarism in the Era of Generative AI. Instead, these tools should guide and empower students. Corwin Press. Nilson, L.
Faculty Focus
JANUARY 21, 2025
Teaching example: In one of my recent courses, I included a “workshop day” for students to peer review each other’s drafts of case conceptualizations. Rethinking Plagiarism in the Era of Generative AI. Instead, these tools should guide and empower students. Corwin Press. Nilson, L.
Faculty Focus
AUGUST 24, 2023
The paper passed three peer reviewers who reported that they believed the paper was written by a person. 1) noted that ChatGPT wrote academic abstracts that passed through the peer review process 32% of the time even after reviewers had been told that some of the abstracts were fake. A report by Paul (2023, p.1)
Faculty Focus
AUGUST 24, 2023
The paper passed three peer reviewers who reported that they believed the paper was written by a person. 1) noted that ChatGPT wrote academic abstracts that passed through the peer review process 32% of the time even after reviewers had been told that some of the abstracts were fake. A report by Paul (2023, p.1)
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
266 
Let's personalize your content