Edsurge

SEPTEMBER 9, 2024

After all, academic research often requires deeper knowledge of a field than is typical in high school, and it involves carefully following ethical guidelines to protect research subjects from potential harm that students may not be aware of without expert guidance. “A No peer reviewed journal would publish this work, she adds.

High School 190

High School High School Schools Students 190

Faculty Focus

JULY 7, 2024

An inclusive learning environment is one where all students feel academically and intellectually supported, feel a sense of belonging and respect, and do not feel closed off from the rest of their peers. Literature suggests that to develop an inclusive learning environment, we must start with self-awareness.

Learning 105

Learning Universal Design Course Design Fairness 105

Gaggle Speaks

APRIL 6, 2022

The decision sciences (AI, machine learning, and other data sciences) are justifiably under scrutiny for bias. It was unintentional—nevertheless, the results were substantiated, peer-reviewed, and published in Science , a historically trusted and credible journal of scientific discovery.

Ethics 52

Ethics Peer Review Evaluation Science 52

Faculty Focus

JANUARY 21, 2025

Instead, we foster an environment of learning, growth, and empowerment. Teaching example: In one of my recent courses, I included a “workshop day” for students to peer review each other’s drafts of case conceptualizations. 2014; Agarwal, 2019).

Plagiarism 111

Plagiarism Syllabus Ethics Feedback 111

Faculty Focus

JUNE 16, 2024

An inclusive learning environment is one where all students feel academically and intellectually supported, feel a sense of belonging and respect, and do not feel closed off from the rest of their peers. Literature suggests that to develop an inclusive learning environment, we must start with self-awareness.

Learning 107

Learning Universal Design Course Design Fairness 107

Faculty Focus

JUNE 16, 2024

An inclusive learning environment is one where all students feel academically and intellectually supported, feel a sense of belonging and respect, and do not feel closed off from the rest of their peers. Literature suggests that to develop an inclusive learning environment, we must start with self-awareness.

Learning 106

Learning Universal Design Course Design Fairness 106

Faculty Focus

JULY 7, 2024

An inclusive learning environment is one where all students feel academically and intellectually supported, feel a sense of belonging and respect, and do not feel closed off from the rest of their peers. Literature suggests that to develop an inclusive learning environment, we must start with self-awareness.

Learning 90

Learning Universal Design Course Design Fairness 90

Faculty Focus

JANUARY 21, 2025

Instead, we foster an environment of learning, growth, and empowerment. Teaching example: In one of my recent courses, I included a “workshop day” for students to peer review each other’s drafts of case conceptualizations. 2014; Agarwal, 2019).

Plagiarism 96

Plagiarism Syllabus Ethics Feedback 96

Faculty Focus

AUGUST 24, 2023

Some academics see these tools as a danger to the full spectrum of learning and as a shortcut. However, there’s an essential difference between Machine learning (ML) or predictive text programs and AI-generated writing. The paper passed three peer reviewers who reported that they believed the paper was written by a person.

Intelligence 98

Intelligence Critical Thinking Academic Integrity Peer Review 98

Edsurge

NOVEMBER 8, 2017

More instructors are experimenting with adaptive-learning systems in their classrooms. The first segment included two guests with different perspectives: Candace Thille, an assistant professor of education at Stanford Graduate School of Education, and Mark Milliron, co-founder and chief learning officer at Civitas Learning.

Peer Review 100

Peer Review Ethics Science Intelligence 100

Faculty Focus

AUGUST 24, 2023

Some academics see these tools as a danger to the full spectrum of learning and as a shortcut. However, there’s an essential difference between Machine learning (ML) or predictive text programs and AI-generated writing. The paper passed three peer reviewers who reported that they believed the paper was written by a person.

Intelligence 94

Intelligence Critical Thinking Academic Integrity Peer Review 94

Faculty Focus

AUGUST 6, 2024

Some common forms of predatory publishing practices include falsely claiming to provide peer review, hiding information about Article Processing Charges (APCs), misrepresenting members of the journal’s editorial board, and other violations of copyright or scholarly ethics (p. The Professor is In , [link] Yildizhan E.

Learning 64

Learning Peer Review Ethics Evaluation 64

Faculty Focus

MARCH 30, 2025

Drawing on the scholarship of teaching and learning (SoTL), it argues that AI can enhance accessibility and efficiency while preserving the human essence of education. A century later, AI is no longer fiction but a dynamic force in community college education, reshaping how faculty teach, and students learn.

Faculty Development 87

Faculty Development Teaching Instructors Academic Integrity 87

Faculty Focus

MAY 11, 2025

Balch & Blanck, 2025; Butulis, 2023; Parks & Oslick, 2024) and to provide their students with instruction and practice in using AI in productive and ethical ways (e.g., What college instructors are needed for, he said, is to motivate our students to learn. Our role is to inspire our students to learn that content.

Instructors 106

Instructors Motivation Critical Thinking Students 106

Edsurge

MARCH 28, 2018

The campus is home to several longtime advocates of open and free learning materials. The faculty member is the expert in this field, you don’t also have to be the expert in copy-editing,” says James Glapa-Grossklag, dean of educational technology, learning resources and distance learning at College of the Canyons.

Textbooks 116

Textbooks Instructors Syllabus History 116

Faculty Focus

FEBRUARY 7, 2023

Initial questions faculty ask about a case can set the tone and dictate distinct pathways of discussion; frame and target the content of a dialogue or student learning; and encourage participation or quickly end a conversation. What ethical issues does this situation present? Learning from the case What can we learn from this case?

Questions 105

Questions Study Skills Evaluation 105

Faculty Focus

MARCH 30, 2025

Drawing on the scholarship of teaching and learning (SoTL), it argues that AI can enhance accessibility and efficiency while preserving the human essence of education. A century later, AI is no longer fiction but a dynamic force in community college education, reshaping how faculty teach, and students learn.

Faculty Development 71

Faculty Development Teaching Instructors Academic Integrity 71

Faculty Focus

AUGUST 6, 2024

Some common forms of predatory publishing practices include falsely claiming to provide peer review, hiding information about Article Processing Charges (APCs), misrepresenting members of the journal’s editorial board, and other violations of copyright or scholarly ethics (p. The Professor is In , [link] Yildizhan E.

Learning 52

Learning Peer Review Ethics Evaluation 52

Faculty Focus

FEBRUARY 7, 2023

Initial questions faculty ask about a case can set the tone and dictate distinct pathways of discussion; frame and target the content of a dialogue or student learning; and encourage participation or quickly end a conversation. What ethical issues does this situation present? Learning from the case What can we learn from this case?

Questions 95

Questions Study Skills Evaluation 95

Dangerously Irrelevant

MARCH 24, 2016

John Hattie, Professor of Education at the University of Auckland, spent 15 years synthesizing the vast body of peer-reviewed, meta-analytical research pertaining to student achievement. Retention flies in the face of both overwhelming research and day-to-day evidence that children learn at different rates.

Peer Review 0

Peer Review Achievement Motivation Students 0

Dangerously Irrelevant

DECEMBER 14, 2018

Flawed, ideological, non-peer-reviewed studies should not rebut decades of anti-retention research. As a researcher and former university educational leadership faculty member, Wayne should know better than this. Emulating downward: Iowa’s misplaced idolization of Florida’s retention policies. Questions for student retention advocates.

Skills 107

Skills Peer Review Secondary Education English 107

Edsurge

DECEMBER 21, 2017

Take LiveEdu , for example, a Y Combinator-backed online learning company that touts itself as being the “next-gen Lynda.com,” referring to a platform that offers online courses and skills training. Tokenized Learning According to data tracked by Coinbase , ICOs have raised nearly $3.4 Everything else is like trading penny stocks.”

Learning 138

Learning Participation History Peer Review 138

Teach Your Kids

MARCH 8, 2025

I’m including them because of the challenges they've overcome and because their work advances equity, agency, and transformative change in education, making learning more inclusive and empowering for all. I’ve learned to lead with risk mitigation before investors ask. The only reason I’ve been able to raise over $1.5

Education 52

Education Ethics Culture Study 52

eSchool News

JANUARY 2, 2025

As generative AI technologies evolve, educators are moving away from fears about AI-enabled cheating and are embracing the idea that AI can open new doors for teaching and learning. Effective AI solutions will integrate seamlessly into the learning environment, enhancing rather than disrupting the teaching experience.

Ethics 348

Ethics Writing Feedback Knowledge 348