Edsurge

FEBRUARY 19, 2020

The team at Digital Promise had been discussing something like this for nearly six years, Cator says. In some cases, according to Cator, the companies that didn’t get certified were able to point to peer-reviewed research but did not have that research readily accessible for users or potential customers.

Education 178

Education Peer Review Motivation Reading 178

Ask a Tech Teacher

MARCH 13, 2019

What exactly is peer feedback and how is it being applied to lower grades? What is peer feedback? When used as an assessment strategy, peer feedback is much more than casual comments shared between classmates. It is the logical evaluation of one student’s work by another using predetermined characteristics and measures.

Feedback 104

Feedback Peer Review Writing Critical Thinking 104

Faculty Focus

SEPTEMBER 19, 2023

According to the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Commission on Colleges (SACSCOC), the body for the accreditation of degree-granting higher education institutions in the southern states, the Quality Enhancement Plan (QEP) evaluative framework consists of an assessment indicator.

Fairness 122

Fairness Instructors Feedback Evaluation 122

Faculty Focus

FEBRUARY 7, 2023

Tucked neatly at the end are a list of discussion questions that faculty can use to debrief or unpack the case. Initial questions faculty ask about a case can set the tone and dictate distinct pathways of discussion; frame and target the content of a dialogue or student learning; and encourage participation or quickly end a conversation.

Questions 105

Questions Study Skills Evaluation 105

Faculty Focus

SEPTEMBER 19, 2023

According to the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Commission on Colleges (SACSCOC), the body for the accreditation of degree-granting higher education institutions in the southern states, the Quality Enhancement Plan (QEP) evaluative framework consists of an assessment indicator.

Fairness 110

Fairness Instructors Feedback Evaluation 110

Faculty Focus

FEBRUARY 7, 2023

Tucked neatly at the end are a list of discussion questions that faculty can use to debrief or unpack the case. Initial questions faculty ask about a case can set the tone and dictate distinct pathways of discussion; frame and target the content of a dialogue or student learning; and encourage participation or quickly end a conversation.

Questions 98

Questions Study Skills Evaluation 98

Faculty Focus

JUNE 16, 2024

This requires thoroughly self-examining personally held biases and evaluating our social connectedness (Dewsbury & Brame, 2019). Thus far, we have discussed the Universal Design for Learning and the integration of the IPEC competencies to foster inclusion and encourage active collaboration.

Learning 110

Learning Universal Design Course Design Fairness 110

Faculty Focus

JUNE 16, 2024

This requires thoroughly self-examining personally held biases and evaluating our social connectedness (Dewsbury & Brame, 2019). Thus far, we have discussed the Universal Design for Learning and the integration of the IPEC competencies to foster inclusion and encourage active collaboration.

Learning 110

Learning Universal Design Course Design Fairness 110

Faculty Focus

JULY 7, 2024

This requires thoroughly self-examining personally held biases and evaluating our social connectedness (Dewsbury & Brame, 2019). Designing With Intention Thus far, we have discussed the Universal Design for Learning and the integration of the IPEC competencies to foster inclusion and encourage active collaboration.

Learning 109

Learning Universal Design Fairness Course Design 109

Faculty Focus

AUGUST 24, 2023

The following discussion will use ChatGPT as a specific AI (artificial intelligence) program and the more general term AI for the increasing number of new programs. The paper passed three peer reviewers who reported that they believed the paper was written by a person. A report by Paul (2023, p.1)

Intelligence 98

Intelligence Critical Thinking Academic Integrity Peer Review 98

Faculty Focus

AUGUST 24, 2023

The following discussion will use ChatGPT as a specific AI (artificial intelligence) program and the more general term AI for the increasing number of new programs. The paper passed three peer reviewers who reported that they believed the paper was written by a person. A report by Paul (2023, p.1)

Intelligence 97

Intelligence Critical Thinking Academic Integrity Peer Review 97

Ask a Tech Teacher

MAY 25, 2022

Here is a good discussion on the pros and cons of Turnitin as well as options available, from the Ask a Tech Teacher crew: Reliable Turnitin Alternatives for K12. That’s quite an advantage since copied materials often come from peer-reviewed articles. You can change this parameter in the settings, but that’s the standard option.

Plagiarism 158

Plagiarism Essay Instructors Peer Review 158

Faculty Focus

MAY 7, 2024

QM’s robust framework, encapsulated in the QM Rubric, evaluates various facets of online course design through eight categories, including learning objectives, alignment, assessment strategies, instructional materials, learner interaction, course technology, learner support, accessibility, and usability.

Feedback 119

Feedback Course Design Instructors Education 119

Faculty Focus

APRIL 20, 2023

Encourage them to reflect on their classroom persona, their culture, their background, and their experience in creating their own content, such as discussion board posts and peer review feedback. Communicating with the online student: The impact of email tone on student performance and teacher evaluations. The Atlantic.

Culture 122

Culture Communication Writing Language 122

Faculty Focus

JULY 7, 2024

This requires thoroughly self-examining personally held biases and evaluating our social connectedness (Dewsbury & Brame, 2019). Designing With Intention Thus far, we have discussed the Universal Design for Learning and the integration of the IPEC competencies to foster inclusion and encourage active collaboration.

Learning 91

Learning Universal Design Fairness Course Design 91

Faculty Focus

MAY 7, 2024

QM’s robust framework, encapsulated in the QM Rubric, evaluates various facets of online course design through eight categories, including learning objectives, alignment, assessment strategies, instructional materials, learner interaction, course technology, learner support, accessibility, and usability.

Feedback 109

Feedback Course Design Instructors Education 109

Faculty Focus

MARCH 30, 2025

This article addresses these questions through a three-part exploration: tracing AI’s historical development, critically evaluating its role in community college classrooms, and offering practical, evidence-based strategies for faculty. How can it enhance teaching without diminishing faculty agency?

Faculty Development 88

Faculty Development Teaching Instructors Academic Integrity 88

Ask a Tech Teacher

NOVEMBER 30, 2015

Who hasn’t been mesmerized by children gathered at a table engaged in a high-level discussion, making shared decisions, and demonstrating deep, scaffolded learning? When students share organic ideas and peer review projects, they build authentic knowledge that everyone takes ownership in, but the saying is easier than the doing.

Writing 90

Writing Students Peer Review Essay 90

Faculty Focus

MARCH 30, 2025

This article addresses these questions through a three-part exploration: tracing AI’s historical development, critically evaluating its role in community college classrooms, and offering practical, evidence-based strategies for faculty. How can it enhance teaching without diminishing faculty agency?

Faculty Development 78

Faculty Development Teaching Instructors Academic Integrity 78

Faculty Focus

APRIL 20, 2023

Encourage them to reflect on their classroom persona, their culture, their background, and their experience in creating their own content, such as discussion board posts and peer review feedback. Communicating with the online student: The impact of email tone on student performance and teacher evaluations. The Atlantic.

Culture 96

Culture Communication Writing Language 96

Faculty Focus

JUNE 11, 2023

I thought this topic was ripe for discussion, had its roots in many different disciplines, and would interest a variety of students. The students loved the chance to get together on their own and discuss the book in a different location than the normal classroom. The topics of the debate were student-generated.

Critical Thinking 79

Critical Thinking Interdisciplinary History Syllabus 79

Scholarly Teacher

SEPTEMBER 18, 2024

As standard practice, we frequently reviewed the class assignment and encouraged students to seek help if they faced any difficulties. Even with the in-class discussions, we would hear phrases like, “I don’t know what you want,” and “I don’t know where to start.” Peer Review. link] Winkelmes, M., Bernacki, M.L.,

Assignments 52

Assignments Students Peer Review Evaluation 52

Faculty Focus

AUGUST 6, 2024

Some common forms of predatory publishing practices include falsely claiming to provide peer review, hiding information about Article Processing Charges (APCs), misrepresenting members of the journal’s editorial board, and other violations of copyright or scholarly ethics (p. You are more than your pubs.

Learning 64

Learning Peer Review Ethics Evaluation 64

Faculty Focus

AUGUST 6, 2024

Some common forms of predatory publishing practices include falsely claiming to provide peer review, hiding information about Article Processing Charges (APCs), misrepresenting members of the journal’s editorial board, and other violations of copyright or scholarly ethics (p. You are more than your pubs.

Learning 52

Learning Peer Review Ethics Evaluation 52

Teaching with a Mountain View

FEBRUARY 27, 2025

Help your students with these tips: Restate the Question: This technique helps students stay on track and signals to evaluators that they understood the question. Discuss interpret during a science experiment or measure in math to reinforce that these skills span disciplines. The cat landed on the chair.

Testing 52

Testing Multiple Choice Questions Math Writing 52

Edsurge

DECEMBER 1, 2018

But my discussions with Ms. But what if we employed machine learning and peer reviews for writing evaluation? Kathy Noble was my son Colin’s special-education teacher. Back in 1999, when Colin was 10, my conversations to date with doctors, therapists and psychologists had been largely focused on Colin’s disability.

Technology 167

Technology Assignments Peer Review Special Education 167

Faculty Focus

JANUARY 22, 2023

For instructors who evaluate to help students develop their writing skills, it would be a waste of time to respond to anything their students did not write – and these students would have little invested in reviewing the feedback. Discuss how AI “learns” to write. Peer review. Topics that avoid AI’s wheelhouse.

Assignments 122

Assignments Writing Plagiarism Instructors 122

Faculty Focus

JANUARY 22, 2023

For instructors who evaluate to help students develop their writing skills, it would be a waste of time to respond to anything their students did not write – and these students would have little invested in reviewing the feedback. Discuss how AI “learns” to write. Peer review. Topics that avoid AI’s wheelhouse.

Assignments 98

Assignments Writing Plagiarism Instructors 98

Cook County EM Blog

APRIL 14, 2022

2019 Feb;26(2): 183-191 What : randomized, controlled, double-blind clinical trial evaluating high-dose IV magnesium (9g in 100cc NS, n=153) vs low-dose IV magnesium (4.5g Cook County EM Residency | PGY3 @GarrettPrince8 Peer Reviewed By: Mark Mycyk, M.D. Acad Emerg Med.

Failure 52

Failure Peer Review Evaluation Study 52

Cook County EM Blog

APRIL 27, 2022

of patients had an ECG within 24 hours of droperidol administration, 3% had a QTc >500 msec No clinically significant arrhythmias observed Discussion The article provides support for the safety of droperidol in low doses in the ED. Assessing pain response through chart review is problematic and subject to numerous biases.

Peer Review 52

Peer Review Study Evaluation Discussions 52