Edsurge

FEBRUARY 27, 2020

Secondary trends, found in only a few of the reviewed resources, included: blended learning, dashboards and learning analytics, virtual reality, and artificial intelligence. Joosten also argued that the field should evaluate trends through subgroups of underrepresented students to promote equity.

Peer Review 217

Peer Review Gamification Mobile Devices Learning 217

Edsurge

MARCH 12, 2021

Nor are they made aware of the peer-review process in which scientists in the field who were not involved with the research critically evaluate the study design and conclusions.

Science 184

Science Peer Review Learning Knowledge 184

Edsurge

FEBRUARY 6, 2020

To mitigate the risks inherent in trying out a potentially ineffective product, we suggest the time and effort spent evaluating the evidence should be proportional to the amount of time students will spend using the product. Reviewing research studies to determine effectiveness can be a complex process.

Study 216

Study Testing Students Peer Review 216

Edsurge

JANUARY 3, 2023

Tailwinds: An Enabling Ecosystem A baseline enabling condition for game-based learning is access to computers and broadband. While there is still work to do in closing the digital divide, access is becoming less of a limiting factor for game-based learning. Over the past few decades, there have been great strides in this area.

Game-Based Learning 186

Game-Based Learning Learning Critical Thinking Peer Review 186

EdTech Magazine

MARCH 4, 2019

The Chromebook App Hub will let users filter applications by grade level and content area, see peer reviews and comments for apps, and follow links to lesson plans that incorporate specific apps. . “It They’ll also be able to see how much apps cost and evaluate how well they would integrate with existing platforms. .

Peer Review 137

Peer Review Teaching Methods Blended Learning Evaluation 137

Edsurge

FEBRUARY 19, 2020

In some cases, according to Cator, the companies that didn’t get certified were able to point to peer-reviewed research but did not have that research readily accessible for users or potential customers. The product team shares the research behind the design publicly.”

Education 178

Education Peer Review Motivation Reading 178

eSchool News

JUNE 28, 2021

A SIIA CODiE Award win is a prestigious honour, following rigorous reviews by expert judges including educators and administrators whose evaluations determined the finalists. The SIIA CODiE Awards is the only peer-reviewed program to showcase business and education technology’s finest products and services.

Mobile Devices 130

Mobile Devices Peer Review Instructors History 130

Edsurge

MAY 28, 2020

The National Council on Teacher Quality, a think tank that evaluates teacher preparation programs, doesn’t collect data related to remote learning or online education, says its director of strategic communications. But she thinks it’s a great resource for educators, especially because it is open-access and freely available.

Teachers 216

Teachers Education Blended Learning STEM 216

Faculty Focus

MAY 7, 2024

QM’s robust framework, encapsulated in the QM Rubric, evaluates various facets of online course design through eight categories, including learning objectives, alignment, assessment strategies, instructional materials, learner interaction, course technology, learner support, accessibility, and usability.

Feedback 118

Feedback Course Design Instructors Education 118

Faculty Focus

JUNE 16, 2024

This requires thoroughly self-examining personally held biases and evaluating our social connectedness (Dewsbury & Brame, 2019). In the ideate stage, the educator should evaluate the problem or focus of the education from multiple perspectives and sit in the seat of both the learner and the educator who will teach the content.

Learning 110

Learning Universal Design Course Design Fairness 110

Faculty Focus

JUNE 16, 2024

This requires thoroughly self-examining personally held biases and evaluating our social connectedness (Dewsbury & Brame, 2019). In the ideate stage, the educator should evaluate the problem or focus of the education from multiple perspectives and sit in the seat of both the learner and the educator who will teach the content.

Learning 109

Learning Universal Design Course Design Fairness 109

Faculty Focus

JULY 7, 2024

This requires thoroughly self-examining personally held biases and evaluating our social connectedness (Dewsbury & Brame, 2019). The educator will need to create an inclusive and fair learning environment for all students as it relates to access to the materials following the event (Billings & Halstead, 2024).

Learning 109

Learning Universal Design Fairness Course Design 109

eSchool News

JULY 26, 2016

The University of Akron launched the GenEd Core Pilot Program in Fall 2015 to help increase access to higher education. Peer Review and Team Review tools enabled students to easily complete and evaluate both self-assessments and team assessments, inspiring teamwork and learning integration.

Online Learning 115

Online Learning Quizzes eLearning Learning 115

Edsurge

JULY 10, 2020

I think this is going to be more heavily relied on, with less access to students in person, test scores, and reliable grades, at least for the spring semester and even going forward next year,” says Marci Miller, an attorney who specializes in education law and disability rights. They also simply may not work.

Fairness 217

Fairness Counselling Testing Disabilities 217

Faculty Focus

AUGUST 24, 2023

The paper passed three peer reviewers who reported that they believed the paper was written by a person. 1) noted that ChatGPT wrote academic abstracts that passed through the peer review process 32% of the time even after reviewers had been told that some of the abstracts were fake. You can access it at [link].

Intelligence 98

Intelligence Critical Thinking Academic Integrity Peer Review 98

Ask a Tech Teacher

MAY 25, 2022

This is the only service that can access the libraries like Elsevier/Scopus and Springer & Nature. That’s quite an advantage since copied materials often come from peer-reviewed articles. This 2-in-1 solution seems pretty nice, especially knowing that it has access to the ProQuest databases. .

Plagiarism 158

Plagiarism Essay Instructors Peer Review 158

Faculty Focus

AUGUST 24, 2023

The paper passed three peer reviewers who reported that they believed the paper was written by a person. 1) noted that ChatGPT wrote academic abstracts that passed through the peer review process 32% of the time even after reviewers had been told that some of the abstracts were fake. You can access it at [link].

Intelligence 97

Intelligence Critical Thinking Academic Integrity Peer Review 97

Faculty Focus

MAY 7, 2024

QM’s robust framework, encapsulated in the QM Rubric, evaluates various facets of online course design through eight categories, including learning objectives, alignment, assessment strategies, instructional materials, learner interaction, course technology, learner support, accessibility, and usability.

Feedback 108

Feedback Course Design Instructors Education 108

Edsurge

OCTOBER 2, 2017

We provide training so they all have a good sense of how to evaluate writing and provide feedback to students.” Henry County schools have high-speed broadband access and provide iPads to every student in grades three through nine. Students must make the time to practice and to peer-review each others' work.

Writing 124

Writing Feedback Exams Middle School 124

Faculty Focus

JULY 7, 2024

This requires thoroughly self-examining personally held biases and evaluating our social connectedness (Dewsbury & Brame, 2019). The educator will need to create an inclusive and fair learning environment for all students as it relates to access to the materials following the event (Billings & Halstead, 2024).

Learning 91

Learning Universal Design Fairness Course Design 91

Faculty Focus

MARCH 30, 2025

Drawing on the scholarship of teaching and learning (SoTL), it argues that AI can enhance accessibility and efficiency while preserving the human essence of education. Benefits: Accessibility and Faculty Efficiency AI enhances accessibility, a cornerstone of community college missions. Spitale et al.

Faculty Development 88

Faculty Development Teaching Instructors Academic Integrity 88

Faculty Focus

MARCH 30, 2025

Drawing on the scholarship of teaching and learning (SoTL), it argues that AI can enhance accessibility and efficiency while preserving the human essence of education. Benefits: Accessibility and Faculty Efficiency AI enhances accessibility, a cornerstone of community college missions. Spitale et al.

Faculty Development 76

Faculty Development Teaching Instructors Academic Integrity 76

Faculty Focus

AUGUST 6, 2024

Some common forms of predatory publishing practices include falsely claiming to provide peer review, hiding information about Article Processing Charges (APCs), misrepresenting members of the journal’s editorial board, and other violations of copyright or scholarly ethics (p. Not necessarily. It’s about more than pubs.

Learning 64

Learning Peer Review Ethics Evaluation 64

Scholarly Teacher

SEPTEMBER 18, 2024

This is even more important as colleges explore how to make education more accessible and equitable. Evaluation Criteria The last step to making an assignment transparent is to give the student the criteria used to evaluate their assignment (TILT: Higher Ed, 2023b). Peer Review. 2019; Lin et al., Bernacki, M.L.,

Assignments 52

Assignments Students Peer Review Evaluation 52

Faculty Focus

JUNE 11, 2023

All students participated in one debate, but when their team was not presenting, the non-debating students took notes—tracing the argument and evaluating the strength of the evidence and refutations, then using those notes to discuss and judge who won the debate. The topics of the debate were student-generated.

Critical Thinking 78

Critical Thinking Interdisciplinary History Syllabus 78

Faculty Focus

AUGUST 6, 2024

Some common forms of predatory publishing practices include falsely claiming to provide peer review, hiding information about Article Processing Charges (APCs), misrepresenting members of the journal’s editorial board, and other violations of copyright or scholarly ethics (p. Not necessarily. It’s about more than pubs.

Learning 52

Learning Peer Review Ethics Evaluation 52

eSchool News

JANUARY 2, 2025

Generative AI holds extraordinary promise, but its adoption must be grounded in practices that prioritize equitable and inclusive access, transparency, and educational excellence. These platforms will dynamically adjust to the student’s interests and learning paces, enhancing accessibility and inclusivity in education.

Ethics 350

Ethics Writing Feedback Knowledge 350