Academic Integrity Disabilities Plagiarism 
eSchool News
NOVEMBER 20, 2023
72 percent of educators are most concerned about plagiarism and cheating due to generative AI, highlighting the need for clear guidelines for students for using AI with academic integrity. “Generative AI is a blend of promise and prudence. “Learning is above all a human endeavor.
Faculty Focus
MAY 9, 2024
The rise of generative AI tools like ChatGPT, Copilot, Claude, Gemini, DALL-E, and Meta AI has created a pressing new challenge for educators: defining academic integrity in the age of AI. Tell your students what YOU allow Every college and university has an academic integrity/honesty or academic dishonesty statement.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
eSchool News
FEBRUARY 28, 2025
Perceived impact of AI on instruction The vast majority of instructional coaches expressed positive expectations regarding AIs potential to reduce educator workload, create personalized learning experiences, and improve access for students with disabilities. The integration of AI in K-12 education presents both opportunities and challenges.
Faculty Focus
MAY 9, 2024
The rise of generative AI tools like ChatGPT, Copilot, Claude, Gemini, DALL-E, and Meta AI has created a pressing new challenge for educators: defining academic integrity in the age of AI. Tell your students what YOU allow Every college and university has an academic integrity/honesty or academic dishonesty statement.
Faculty Focus
AUGUST 1, 2023
Should you redesign your academic integrity syllabus statement or does your current one suffice? Redesigning academic integrity statements is essential. AI text detectors do not work in the same way that plagiarism checkers do. Plagiarism checkers compare human-written text with other human-written text.
Faculty Focus
AUGUST 1, 2023
Should you redesign your academic integrity syllabus statement or does your current one suffice? Redesigning academic integrity statements is essential. AI text detectors do not work in the same way that plagiarism checkers do. Plagiarism checkers compare human-written text with other human-written text.
Faculty Focus
FEBRUARY 4, 2024
These include over-reliance, plagiarism, bias, limited creativity, ethical considerations, accessibility issues, oversimplification, distraction, and dehumanization of the learning experience. Additionally, CAPTCHAs should be designed to be accessible to individuals with disabilities, such as those with visual or auditory impairments.
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
343 
Let's personalize your content