This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Transparency throughout the student writing process enables educators to leverage the opportunities that AI technologies present, while upholding the integrity of original student work, said Turnitin chief product officer Annie Chechitelli. What are you using AI for in your school/classroom? This press release originally appeared online.
Concerns about academic dishonesty, loss of criticalthinking skills, and inappropriate content creation have sparked discussions about banning AI tools like ChatGPT, Grammarly, and others. However, with thoughtful integration and a shift in perspective, AI can be a powerful ally in the classroom rather than an adversary.
On AI in the classroom, educators said they are most concerned that it will negatively impact students’ social skills, criticalthinking, academicintegrity, creativity, and memory retention.
The intersection of AI assistance in student writing is not just about the convenience it brings, but also about the fundamental shift it represents in how we perceive and approach academicintegrity and skill development. These statistics alone underscore the pervasiveness of AI in academic environments.
What makes this continuum so effective is how it blends criticalthinking with character education. Whether its writing a research paper with academicintegrity or designing a technology solution that addresses a global issue, Elmwood girls learn how to think deeply and act responsibly. Meadowcroft.
Many teachers and educational institutions have even gone as far as to ban ChatGPT due to concerns of cheating and academicintegrity. Instead, educators should consider the many ways they can leverage ChatGPT and AI to foster creativity and criticalthinking among their students.
This approach stems from concerns about academicintegrity, originality, and the potential for AI to undermine the development of criticalthinking and problem-solving skills. Schools or instructors adopting this stance may wish to emphasize traditional methods of learning and assessment.
Not only does it make educators revise their approach to teaching academic writing, but some still see it as a threat to students’ academicintegrity. We know that technologies affect how people read, write, and think. Influencing the education niche, it’s a game-changer in the classroom. But you know what?
As Generative AI (GenAI, a subset of AI that can produce content, ideas, and data by learning from existing data and patterns) has become prevalent, so have a wide range of concerns about its usage: authenticity, criticalthinking, bias, representation, plagiarism, and sustainability, to name a few. I value criticalthinking.
If students overuse AI to write essays, they may not engage in criticalthinking and creativity. Educational institutions must balance using AI technologies with keeping students engaged in the learning process, especially in improving their creative and precise thinking skills.
Coaches worry that AI makes it easier for students to plagiarize or rely on generated answers without truly understanding concepts which can negatively impact academicintegrity. They recommend robust integrating discussions on digital literacy, AI biases, and the ethical implications of generative AI into classroom conversations.
By Carl Hooker One of the biggest misconceptions about AI in education is that it will encourage students to cheat and cause academicintegrity concerns. However, there are a couple of major problems with this line of thinking. Truth: Educators need to reconsider how they assess student work. ABSOLUTELY.
By harnessing the power of technology, educators can inspire curiosity, cultivate criticalthinking skills, and foster a deeper appreciation for the complexities of the past and present.
As Generative AI (GenAI, a subset of AI that can produce content, ideas, and data by learning from existing data and patterns) has become prevalent, so have a wide range of concerns about its usage: authenticity, criticalthinking, bias, representation, plagiarism, and sustainability, to name a few. I value criticalthinking.
To support academicintegrity, randomized questions ensure each student is assigned unique problems to work on. A new drag-and-drop question type that develops students’ criticalthinking skills by helping them build evidence and concepts into models. Randomized questions.
Educators often ask: How can we help ELLs succeed academically while fostering their independence and criticalthinking skills? The answer lies in two transformative strategies: metacognition and the integration of artificial intelligence (AI).
These districts have sought insight from business and industry about the ways in which technology is being integrated into the workplace and engaged with experts in technology about how AI can be integrated into schools to provide a more robust and individualized learning experience for students.
The rise of ChatGPT, Google Bard, New Bing, and others in the academic space, however, is skyrocketing. As I scanned topics like academicintegrity, academic dishonesty, and plagiarism, I quickly adopted others’ persuasive opinions based on limited information. My initial encounters with this rising AI were biased.
If you're using a tool that benefits or takes inspiration from your creative masterpiece, it's not truly aligned with core creative values and academicintegrity. In what ways does AI help foster creativity while ensuring that student work remains authentic? AI can support any part of the creative process.
The rise of ChatGPT, Google Bard, New Bing, and others in the academic space, however, is skyrocketing. As I scanned topics like academicintegrity, academic dishonesty, and plagiarism, I quickly adopted others’ persuasive opinions based on limited information. My initial encounters with this rising AI were biased.
Overreliance on AI risks undermining criticalthinking; Pritts (2023) warns that tools generating papers may erode analytical skills, echoing SoTL calls for active learning (Davidson, 2021). 2023) highlight AI’s dual edge: it clarifies concepts but also crafts compelling disinformation, posing risks to academicintegrity.
Some academics see these tools as a danger to the full spectrum of learning and as a shortcut. Further, students may not develop the skills necessary for original ideas and criticalthinking. However, it is a challenge that should be embraced sooner rather than later.
Some academics see these tools as a danger to the full spectrum of learning and as a shortcut. Further, students may not develop the skills necessary for original ideas and criticalthinking. However, it is a challenge that should be embraced sooner rather than later.
Overreliance on AI risks undermining criticalthinking; Pritts (2023) warns that tools generating papers may erode analytical skills, echoing SoTL calls for active learning (Davidson, 2021). 2023) highlight AI’s dual edge: it clarifies concepts but also crafts compelling disinformation, posing risks to academicintegrity.
Combating bot misuse in higher education Faculty can play a crucial role in mitigating the misuse of bots in higher education by implementing proactive measures and fostering a culture of academicintegrity. Remember, the goal is to maintain the integrity of the educational experience for all students.
Hutson (2024) identifies the challenges of AI in education as the blurred boundaries between human and AI-generated content, the inadequacy of traditional plagiarism definitions, and the need to balance the ethical integration of AI with the preservation of criticalthinking, originality, and intellectual property standards.
These districts have sought insight from business and industry about the ways in which technology is being integrated into the workplace and engaged with experts in technology about how AI can be integrated into schools to provide a more robust and individualized learning experience for students.
Combating bot misuse in higher education Faculty can play a crucial role in mitigating the misuse of bots in higher education by implementing proactive measures and fostering a culture of academicintegrity. Remember, the goal is to maintain the integrity of the educational experience for all students.
Institutions must seize this opportunity by collaborating with AI experts, starting with small-scale implementation and integrating generative AI where it can have the most significant impact. This tool will help bridge the perceived power dynamic between who has all the information and who doesn’t.
Hutson (2024) identifies the challenges of AI in education as the blurred boundaries between human and AI-generated content, the inadequacy of traditional plagiarism definitions, and the need to balance the ethical integration of AI with the preservation of criticalthinking, originality, and intellectual property standards.
Literature review Writing assignments have traditionally served as a means to support the development of criticalthinking skills in higher education. The results of this project do not provide an indubitable foundation to address academicintegrity concerns.
Literature review Writing assignments have traditionally served as a means to support the development of criticalthinking skills in higher education. The results of this project do not provide an indubitable foundation to address academicintegrity concerns.
Issues like academicintegrity and plagiarism have already pushed us to rethink assessment strategies and the concept of a learning community. And theres also the risk that overreliance on AI could erode students ability to build foundational knowledge, which is crucial for criticalthinking (Zakrajsek, 2025).
The concern at the time was to preserve academicintegrity when students were suddenly taking classes remotely — though she believes the approach can also safeguard against cheating using AI chatbots that have emerged since she started the project. I’m trying to promote excellence and teach students criticalthinking,” she says.
But experts have also raised ethical concerns about how student data is used (and misused) by AI companies, how students can use AI for cheating and plagiarism, the erosion of criticalthinking skills , and the spread of misinformation.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 5,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content